episode of the series des Barbapapa Barbapapa dans lequel à la plage will ses amis avec François et Claudine. ...
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Pokemon Emulator For Nokia N70
Barbapapa
episode of the series des Barbapapa Barbapapa dans lequel à la plage will ses amis avec François et Claudine. ...
episode of the series des Barbapapa Barbapapa dans lequel à la plage will ses amis avec François et Claudine. ...
Arcade Legend Cabinet
Video sobre el de Francia on
Usually when we speak of France comes to mind Paris luxury food and fashion but the view is that France is not just that many more things I could not imagine that a country so beautiful and the capital of sleep more than light and love could be such activities as pleasant and great educational content course France is a great country which is worth a visit almost obligatory 
Usually when we speak of France comes to mind Paris luxury food and fashion but the view is that France is not just that many more things I could not imagine that a country so beautiful and the capital of sleep more than light and love could be such activities as pleasant and great educational content course France is a great country which is worth a visit almost obligatory
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Party Gown For Rent In Manila
End of Blog
I'm back in France so late blog:)
soon for another blog on another subject, I do not know where ^ ^ + +
I'm back in France so late blog:)
soon for another blog on another subject, I do not know where ^ ^ + +
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Rape On Train,busmovie
Return! Morning Walk
yes I'm back ^ ^ it was 3 / 4 weeks of storms so nothing to tell ... Today
beautiful weather, I asked myself at Mount Royal Park with Semm, a friend of Entropia Universe and I must say that the atmosphere is really great ^ ^ Ca
smokes in all corners, AC plays tamtam, AC does yoga, football, soccer, the elequilibriste ....
short I really had a super quiet after noon lying in the grass:) Sorry
photos in the disorder lack the courage to lol classify
And a video:
yes I'm back ^ ^ it was 3 / 4 weeks of storms so nothing to tell ... Today
beautiful weather, I asked myself at Mount Royal Park with Semm, a friend of Entropia Universe and I must say that the atmosphere is really great ^ ^ Ca
smokes in all corners, AC plays tamtam, AC does yoga, football, soccer, the elequilibriste ....
short I really had a super quiet after noon lying in the grass:) Sorry
photos in the disorder lack the courage to lol classify
And a video:
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Sad Instrumental French Songs
official theory of migration Oil: a little laugh
At this level anything, it's better to laugh.
Oil down with a slant path (step 1). Then we do not know why, just where the hollow starts up (step 2).
Oil drops vertically while being happily above the cavity (step 1). Of course, it bypasses (step 2). Then, for some reason more than mysterious, he makes a point to another to move horizontally (step 3), and of course towards the hollow and not in the opposite direction (in this example, I'm moving horizontally as soon as it is side. But it could do so below). And finally, once and below the hollow, it does not continue to move horizontally, which would make it no longer below the trough. No, it starts up (step 4). Obviously, it is not sure why the movement of departure is not the case the previous drawing. But hey. There is more to it closely.
What happens if oil is buried below 2 km?
According to the official theory, the formation of the oil window is located 2 km below the earth. Beyond that, it becomes gas. And normally, once the oil is formed, it rises to the surface, pressure difference.
So if we follow well the official theory. If oil is found for example 4 km under the earth, it means that instead of going directly, as stipulated also the official theory, that oil is down first 2 km, then once it was found under a rock shaped hollow, there, for some mysterious reason it stopped down. And he has instead made up (but was prevented by impermeable rock).
And it's even better than that, because as it was that oil migrates under the bell waterproof, it should be on the side that comes in slanting down, and just at that moment, he decided he had to go back . Either it came from above with a vertical movement down, went around the bell. Suddenly, he decided to move horizontally instead of going down, slipping under the bell. And finally, he decided to get back to . So in this case, it would squarely three different movements. And of course, always at the right time.
According to the official theory, the formation of the oil window is located 2 km below the earth. Beyond that, it becomes gas. And normally, once the oil is formed, it rises to the surface, pressure difference.
So if we follow well the official theory. If oil is found for example 4 km under the earth, it means that instead of going directly, as stipulated also the official theory, that oil is down first 2 km, then once it was found under a rock shaped hollow, there, for some mysterious reason it stopped down. And he has instead made up (but was prevented by impermeable rock).
And it's even better than that, because as it was that oil migrates under the bell waterproof, it should be on the side that comes in slanting down, and just at that moment, he decided he had to go back . Either it came from above with a vertical movement down, went around the bell. Suddenly, he decided to move horizontally instead of going down, slipping under the bell. And finally, he decided to get back to . So in this case, it would squarely three different movements. And of course, always at the right time.
At this level anything, it's better to laugh.
Oil down with a slant path (step 1). Then we do not know why, just where the hollow starts up (step 2). 
Oil drops vertically while being happily above the cavity (step 1). Of course, it bypasses (step 2). Then, for some reason more than mysterious, he makes a point to another to move horizontally (step 3), and of course towards the hollow and not in the opposite direction (in this example, I'm moving horizontally as soon as it is side. But it could do so below). And finally, once and below the hollow, it does not continue to move horizontally, which would make it no longer below the trough. No, it starts up (step 4). Obviously, it is not sure why the movement of departure is not the case the previous drawing. But hey. There is more to it closely. Monday, July 21, 2008
Burst Capillaries On Breast Causes
The development of the theory of abiotic oil in the USSR, made to maintain confidentiality on this theory?
When one reflects the fact that the abiotic oil theory developed in the USSR, one wonders if it was not done on purpose by people who govern us in the shade. Specially for what? To develop theory quietly with few people know of its existence, and then possibly be able to bury him once the results and the theory firmly established.
It is still strange that the USSR, which was supposed to be the champion of the liberation of the proletariat, has not spread this theory thoroughly in Western countries. It was not difficult, since it had relays in many western countries: writers, newspapers, political movements. It would just have to want, and hundreds of articles and dozens of books have been written on the subject few years. And the Western official theory was thoroughly discredited.
In the political struggle against the capitalist West, it would have been an element of weight. Show that oil companies and even the capitalist governments agreed to give the impression that oil was a scarce resource would have resulted in a loss of confidence by the people in these governments and would have allowed the USSR to position themselves as white knight on this vital topic.
Yet none of this. The total nothingness. It's very weird. Even more bizarre that on other topics, the USSR not wanting to attempt to show that it was better than the capitalist governments (improvement of living conditions, health, education, social happiness, the space adventure, etc. ...). So it is totally inconsistent with the policy of pro-Communist propaganda that it was elsewhere.
Obviously, there is a contradiction if the USSR was what it seemed. If it is not, it is already becoming much less bizarre.
But in this case, if it was just a cog in a power more powerful and hidden, then one wonders why this power has allowed the development of the theory of abiotic oil USSR. This power, however, had no interest in this theory is known.
And that's where we can say that to develop the theory in the USSR allowed to do quietly, with few people aware of a circle to share more or less extensive of scientists and engineers Russian. It was the ideal country for that. Freedom of movement and publication was prohibited. Suddenly, we were able to control on a thorough publications on the subject. It was therefore almost certain that nothing leaks out. And besides, there was the language barrier for almost all Western was added to it.
Finally, as the power in question also controls the media and Western media, it was on in the end, very little information that could possibly emerge from the USSR, would never manage the ears of the public. So for people wanting to develop the theory, but it happens to the ears of the Western public, the USSR was the perfect place.
There is the question whether the Soviet public was aware of this information. It sure would have made it harder and longer choking of this theory in Russia. But it is likely that the theory was known only in a relatively small coterie of scientists and engineers. Within this group, it was widely known, but outside, it is likely that only a very small percentage of the population was aware of its existence. Logically, that's the secret power to have organized the thing. So in this case, the theory remained easily erasable.
course, there was the problem that if the USSR was liberalized one day, all these documents could return to the surface and spread throughout the world. But this power, since it controls the media and distribution channels for books, could very well be disappear relatively quickly the books in question from the circuit. It could also begin to promote the theory of oil and thus marginalize the biotic of abiotic oil. And that is indeed what seems to have happened. There are echoes like what, after the liberalization of 1989, books on the theory of abiotic oil has been gradually removed from bookstores and libraries in Russia. Moreover, it is clear that the biotic oil theory is now the only theory advanced by the Russian media.
Since in any case, the power in question has finally managed to suppress information, The question "what is the power in question had foreseen the collapse of the USSR, had organized the show, and had therefore had time to organize the suppression of this information, or does he responded to the event after the fact? " is not crucial. But you may think it is unlikely that the hidden power in question has not been the cause of liberalization of the USSR. The liberalization was therefore certainly long anticipated. Therefore, the assumption that he would react after the fact at this event is unlikely.
So the fact that the theory was developed in the USSR could well not be because then, the USSR was still the real USSR Communist who fought for the good of the proletariat (something the late Rolf Martens, another defender abiotic theory, thought), but simply because the lack of freedoms and the language barrier assured the occult power can leave this theory develop into any discretion, to gather information and conclusion, then bury it if necessary. There have been no altruism behind the development of this theory in the USSR.
It is still strange that the USSR, which was supposed to be the champion of the liberation of the proletariat, has not spread this theory thoroughly in Western countries. It was not difficult, since it had relays in many western countries: writers, newspapers, political movements. It would just have to want, and hundreds of articles and dozens of books have been written on the subject few years. And the Western official theory was thoroughly discredited.
In the political struggle against the capitalist West, it would have been an element of weight. Show that oil companies and even the capitalist governments agreed to give the impression that oil was a scarce resource would have resulted in a loss of confidence by the people in these governments and would have allowed the USSR to position themselves as white knight on this vital topic.
Yet none of this. The total nothingness. It's very weird. Even more bizarre that on other topics, the USSR not wanting to attempt to show that it was better than the capitalist governments (improvement of living conditions, health, education, social happiness, the space adventure, etc. ...). So it is totally inconsistent with the policy of pro-Communist propaganda that it was elsewhere.
Obviously, there is a contradiction if the USSR was what it seemed. If it is not, it is already becoming much less bizarre.
But in this case, if it was just a cog in a power more powerful and hidden, then one wonders why this power has allowed the development of the theory of abiotic oil USSR. This power, however, had no interest in this theory is known.
And that's where we can say that to develop the theory in the USSR allowed to do quietly, with few people aware of a circle to share more or less extensive of scientists and engineers Russian. It was the ideal country for that. Freedom of movement and publication was prohibited. Suddenly, we were able to control on a thorough publications on the subject. It was therefore almost certain that nothing leaks out. And besides, there was the language barrier for almost all Western was added to it.
Finally, as the power in question also controls the media and Western media, it was on in the end, very little information that could possibly emerge from the USSR, would never manage the ears of the public. So for people wanting to develop the theory, but it happens to the ears of the Western public, the USSR was the perfect place.
There is the question whether the Soviet public was aware of this information. It sure would have made it harder and longer choking of this theory in Russia. But it is likely that the theory was known only in a relatively small coterie of scientists and engineers. Within this group, it was widely known, but outside, it is likely that only a very small percentage of the population was aware of its existence. Logically, that's the secret power to have organized the thing. So in this case, the theory remained easily erasable.
course, there was the problem that if the USSR was liberalized one day, all these documents could return to the surface and spread throughout the world. But this power, since it controls the media and distribution channels for books, could very well be disappear relatively quickly the books in question from the circuit. It could also begin to promote the theory of oil and thus marginalize the biotic of abiotic oil. And that is indeed what seems to have happened. There are echoes like what, after the liberalization of 1989, books on the theory of abiotic oil has been gradually removed from bookstores and libraries in Russia. Moreover, it is clear that the biotic oil theory is now the only theory advanced by the Russian media.
Since in any case, the power in question has finally managed to suppress information, The question "what is the power in question had foreseen the collapse of the USSR, had organized the show, and had therefore had time to organize the suppression of this information, or does he responded to the event after the fact? " is not crucial. But you may think it is unlikely that the hidden power in question has not been the cause of liberalization of the USSR. The liberalization was therefore certainly long anticipated. Therefore, the assumption that he would react after the fact at this event is unlikely.
So the fact that the theory was developed in the USSR could well not be because then, the USSR was still the real USSR Communist who fought for the good of the proletariat (something the late Rolf Martens, another defender abiotic theory, thought), but simply because the lack of freedoms and the language barrier assured the occult power can leave this theory develop into any discretion, to gather information and conclusion, then bury it if necessary. There have been no altruism behind the development of this theory in the USSR.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Michigan County Appraisal District
The problem of blockage of oil from the subduction zones
Another problem concerning the formation of oil in subduction zones is the transport and retention of oil in the rock or layer of debris.
Click on image to enlarge
The problem initially was that the remains of plants are expected to settle to the bottom of the ocean and there no sediment is going to ask it. The debris layer is above the ocean floor rock. And normally, the oil will be produced in this layer of debris.
There is no reason that oil is found in the rock, as it is formed in a layer that is above the rock. So already, it is unclear how it can be in it thereafter.
And we do not even mention the fact that it is often found at 4 or 5 km below the surface, then it is supposed to be formed at a depth between 2 and 3 km and it is supposed to then go back immediately.
But in addition, there is the problem of blocking oil when it goes back to sea level of the plate. To reassemble, the oil must pass through either layer of debris (the most logical assumption) or through the rock that lies beneath the debris.
Consider first the crossing of the layer of debris. If the layer of debris passes oil, then it means it is permeable to it. So we do not see why, once back in the sea, via the layer of debris, oil would remain in the layer of debris. It should instead go back into the sea and be lost.
In this drawing, I strongly thickened layer of debris to avoid having to zoom too. Well, it sure is not a Rembrandt, but the elements are there. As can be seen, the oil passes through the layer of debris and leaves in the sea
This problem remains the same if one considers the rock . If oil can get in the rock of the sea plate, then it means it is permeable to oil. So, it should eventually be lost in the sea
Oil passes through the rock layer. But since there is no impervious area, it is apparent in the sea
And a priori, it is difficult to say that the top layer of impermeable rock is marine oil. First you may think that the constitution of the rock is identical to hundreds of meters thick, because it is a rock formed by magma of a ridge sea. So there is no reason that the top of the slab is more impermeable layers that a little deeper. But more importantly, because the debris were seen above the rock, oil from cross it before rising to the surface. So if it went through the top layer of rock, it means that it is permeable to oil. Especially as all this is that supposed to happen over an area several kilometers wide, it is not sure why the composition of the rock sea fundamentally change a few kilometers.
And even assuming that there one or two layers of impervious rock , given that oil is supposed to go back permanently along the sea plate to avoid being pushed forward in the mantle, this means that at one time or another It would be faced with a permeable rock. And therefore, he could get through this rock and get lost in the sea
Or, if oil is found trapped in a hollow waterproof, it could move more, and would be subject to movement Sea plate. And he would slowly toward the subduction zone. And then there are two possibilities. Let , with tipping plate at 45 °, it would no longer be retained in the hollow. He then began to rise again. And he again encounters an impermeable hollow, the same operation will be repeated. Otherwise, it will be lost in the sea eventually, he will end up being bound in a cycle where it will not encounter impermeable hollow. So it will end up being necessarily lost. Let remains trapped in the rock, and eventually resulted in the mantle with him.
The oil gets stuck in the rocks because of low sea waterproof.
Yes, but the trough moves with the plate. And then, quickly, within a few tens of thousands of years, the hollow is no longer in the right direction and lets the oil is lost into the sea again And even if it was not the case The oil would then be driven deep into the hollow.
could also think about the possibility that oil remonstrated in the rock and the layer of plant debris is impervious to oil. But in this case, we would not find oil at 3 or 5 km beneath the ocean floor, but only a few tens of meters (and than one hundred meters).
And also, a priori, I do not think we say that there is still a layer of debris on the ocean floor. We must think there is enough plants to do so and it was a phenomenon peculiar to the dinosaur age. So we must think the last bit of debris layer turned into oil long ago. So, as there would be more then a layer of debris, we could not defend the idea that oil would eventually be blocked by it.
the way, it means that the idea of horizontal infiltration of oil that I mentioned in the article precedent would be set aside by this problem. This idea could justify the presence of oil far into the sea plate. But if oil is lost in the sea, precisely because it can seep into the rock to get to the cross, it does have more possibility to have oil on the side of the plate sea. And therefore, we are left with the problem is the complete absence of oil (because wholly lost) or a field as a very thin strip.
One might think that the oil could be trapped under the plate land. But already, we must see that the tectonic plate sinking sea very rapidly under the land plate, at least 45 °. Oil is formed only 2 km maximum (depth and length) of the beginning of the depression of the sea plate. And the zone of oil formation oil itself as having only 1 km wide. Assuming that the oil spread over a greater width in back, it would leave only about 2 km wide, up to hold oil. So anyway, the field would be very thin, as previously noted.
ago two options regarding the retention of oil by terrestrial rock. Let the rock is immediately impermeable to oil (ie, just above the layer of debris), or it is only after .
If the rock is impermeable land immediately oil (ie oil does not sink into the rock. It is immediately blocked it), then, as the Marine plate makes an angle with the ground plate, it is not in a situation where there would be one or more hollow. So, normally, the oil should go up along the bend and out into the sea
The terrestrial rock is impervious to oil immediately. So it goes in the layer of debris and is lost in the sea
Sometimes, on some representation of the subduction zone, there is a place which the bend is flat. Which would mean that eventually, the oil may remain stored in this area if the land was immediately impermeable rock. But then either the oil remains in the corner of the elbow, and in this case, there is always the problem of the width of the oil field. Or it extends to the sea, and in this case, it should reach the junction of the plate and out.
But in fact it should not be any horizontal area. Otherwise, it would mean that the plate Maritime fell below the earth plate. And suddenly, the plate sea would have no reason to do after an elbow. It would pass under the earth plate. So what needs to happen is that the plate is simply stopped shipping the ground plate and password below. And it does not logically an angle of 45 °, but almost 90 degrees. So there is no area for the storage of oil. Oil rises along the terrestrial rock, but it has no place to stop. And no question that it cannot earth plate. Because it falls on the fact that the blow, the sea does not sink plate at 90 °, but would slide under the Earth plate. You really have a frontal impact with the ground plate for there depression of the plate and not slipping.
Second possibility, oil rises in terrestrial rock (which is not impervious to the beginning).
Already, of course, requires that the oil rises in a hollow . Because otherwise, with a flat area, the oil could seep over the sides of the area is being lost (in the sea, air, or in the magma). And with upward sloping areas, he remonstrated, then slip along the impermeable zone before going out to sea or air. And must the upper trough is well above the zone of oil formation. Otherwise, the side of the mountain, oil could end up in the magma flow. And of course, this very special configuration of hollow exactly the right place may be quite rare. So there will be plenty of places where it can not be any oil in the mountains (and therefore no oil at all, since we saw as other places, it can not exist).
only viable solution. Oil rises in rock on Earth, which is permeable to the top, but not anymore after a few hundred meters or a few kilometers. The problem is that the width of the field is then only 1 or 2 km max.
could have an area within a large hollow in the mountains. And so, oil would end up first at the periphery of large hollow, then remonstrated to the top of the mountain to the summit of the great hollow. But it seems hardly possible, because the top of the trough would have every chance to recover while in the magma flow, which would entail the loss of oil.
The trough is wider. Yes, but suddenly, the magma rises into it.
In fact, assuming that the mountain has a slope of 45 °, it would mean that every mile is one kilometer in height would entail is long. So, like a mountain of average height is only 6 or 7 miles high, it would mean that the oil storage area would have only a maximum width of 4 or 5 kilometers. Indeed, it is conceivable that in the end zone 6 or 7 km depth, the magma is present and then burning the oil. So if there were large hollow, it would only 4 or 5 km.
So even if oil had the opportunity to stay in the ground plate, the field would have only a tiny width.
In addition, we may say that if oil can go, maybe that magma could also happen. So there is still a good chance that there is an infiltration of magma into the great hollow in question.
course, this kind of thing could not happen on the other side, the side sea or air, since there would be no room for the great hollow. The summit of the great hollow should be outdoors. And so, in fact, it would have only ascending slope.
If the depth was wider on the other side, of course, the summit would fall in vacuum. So we would really just upslope. And oil is apparent in water or air Free.
And in addition, a priori, there was almost no oil found in the mountains. So it does not seem to defend this kind of theory.
So the only possibility that there is oil in an area of subdution is that it goes back into the rock of the earth plate (hence the rock is permeable to start, but is no more later), and there met a small or a large recessed area. Large hollow area that can not be found until near the ground. And even if these conditions are present, the fields have a width of 4 or 5 km max. And he would be in the mountains.
So anyway, at best it would field a very thin, especially low ability. We would not field giant. But mostly, there should be anything at all.
Another problem concerning the formation of oil in subduction zones is the transport and retention of oil in the rock or layer of debris.
Click on image to enlarge The problem initially was that the remains of plants are expected to settle to the bottom of the ocean and there no sediment is going to ask it. The debris layer is above the ocean floor rock. And normally, the oil will be produced in this layer of debris.
There is no reason that oil is found in the rock, as it is formed in a layer that is above the rock. So already, it is unclear how it can be in it thereafter.
And we do not even mention the fact that it is often found at 4 or 5 km below the surface, then it is supposed to be formed at a depth between 2 and 3 km and it is supposed to then go back immediately.
But in addition, there is the problem of blocking oil when it goes back to sea level of the plate. To reassemble, the oil must pass through either layer of debris (the most logical assumption) or through the rock that lies beneath the debris.
Consider first the crossing of the layer of debris. If the layer of debris passes oil, then it means it is permeable to it. So we do not see why, once back in the sea, via the layer of debris, oil would remain in the layer of debris. It should instead go back into the sea and be lost.
In this drawing, I strongly thickened layer of debris to avoid having to zoom too. Well, it sure is not a Rembrandt, but the elements are there. As can be seen, the oil passes through the layer of debris and leaves in the sea This problem remains the same if one considers the rock . If oil can get in the rock of the sea plate, then it means it is permeable to oil. So, it should eventually be lost in the sea
Oil passes through the rock layer. But since there is no impervious area, it is apparent in the sea And a priori, it is difficult to say that the top layer of impermeable rock is marine oil. First you may think that the constitution of the rock is identical to hundreds of meters thick, because it is a rock formed by magma of a ridge sea. So there is no reason that the top of the slab is more impermeable layers that a little deeper. But more importantly, because the debris were seen above the rock, oil from cross it before rising to the surface. So if it went through the top layer of rock, it means that it is permeable to oil. Especially as all this is that supposed to happen over an area several kilometers wide, it is not sure why the composition of the rock sea fundamentally change a few kilometers.
And even assuming that there one or two layers of impervious rock , given that oil is supposed to go back permanently along the sea plate to avoid being pushed forward in the mantle, this means that at one time or another It would be faced with a permeable rock. And therefore, he could get through this rock and get lost in the sea
Or, if oil is found trapped in a hollow waterproof, it could move more, and would be subject to movement Sea plate. And he would slowly toward the subduction zone. And then there are two possibilities. Let , with tipping plate at 45 °, it would no longer be retained in the hollow. He then began to rise again. And he again encounters an impermeable hollow, the same operation will be repeated. Otherwise, it will be lost in the sea eventually, he will end up being bound in a cycle where it will not encounter impermeable hollow. So it will end up being necessarily lost. Let remains trapped in the rock, and eventually resulted in the mantle with him.
The oil gets stuck in the rocks because of low sea waterproof. 
Yes, but the trough moves with the plate. And then, quickly, within a few tens of thousands of years, the hollow is no longer in the right direction and lets the oil is lost into the sea again And even if it was not the case The oil would then be driven deep into the hollow. could also think about the possibility that oil remonstrated in the rock and the layer of plant debris is impervious to oil. But in this case, we would not find oil at 3 or 5 km beneath the ocean floor, but only a few tens of meters (and than one hundred meters).
And also, a priori, I do not think we say that there is still a layer of debris on the ocean floor. We must think there is enough plants to do so and it was a phenomenon peculiar to the dinosaur age. So we must think the last bit of debris layer turned into oil long ago. So, as there would be more then a layer of debris, we could not defend the idea that oil would eventually be blocked by it.
the way, it means that the idea of horizontal infiltration of oil that I mentioned in the article precedent would be set aside by this problem. This idea could justify the presence of oil far into the sea plate. But if oil is lost in the sea, precisely because it can seep into the rock to get to the cross, it does have more possibility to have oil on the side of the plate sea. And therefore, we are left with the problem is the complete absence of oil (because wholly lost) or a field as a very thin strip.
One might think that the oil could be trapped under the plate land. But already, we must see that the tectonic plate sinking sea very rapidly under the land plate, at least 45 °. Oil is formed only 2 km maximum (depth and length) of the beginning of the depression of the sea plate. And the zone of oil formation oil itself as having only 1 km wide. Assuming that the oil spread over a greater width in back, it would leave only about 2 km wide, up to hold oil. So anyway, the field would be very thin, as previously noted.
ago two options regarding the retention of oil by terrestrial rock. Let the rock is immediately impermeable to oil (ie, just above the layer of debris), or it is only after .
If the rock is impermeable land immediately oil (ie oil does not sink into the rock. It is immediately blocked it), then, as the Marine plate makes an angle with the ground plate, it is not in a situation where there would be one or more hollow. So, normally, the oil should go up along the bend and out into the sea
The terrestrial rock is impervious to oil immediately. So it goes in the layer of debris and is lost in the sea Sometimes, on some representation of the subduction zone, there is a place which the bend is flat. Which would mean that eventually, the oil may remain stored in this area if the land was immediately impermeable rock. But then either the oil remains in the corner of the elbow, and in this case, there is always the problem of the width of the oil field. Or it extends to the sea, and in this case, it should reach the junction of the plate and out.
But in fact it should not be any horizontal area. Otherwise, it would mean that the plate Maritime fell below the earth plate. And suddenly, the plate sea would have no reason to do after an elbow. It would pass under the earth plate. So what needs to happen is that the plate is simply stopped shipping the ground plate and password below. And it does not logically an angle of 45 °, but almost 90 degrees. So there is no area for the storage of oil. Oil rises along the terrestrial rock, but it has no place to stop. And no question that it cannot earth plate. Because it falls on the fact that the blow, the sea does not sink plate at 90 °, but would slide under the Earth plate. You really have a frontal impact with the ground plate for there depression of the plate and not slipping.
Second possibility, oil rises in terrestrial rock (which is not impervious to the beginning).
Already, of course, requires that the oil rises in a hollow . Because otherwise, with a flat area, the oil could seep over the sides of the area is being lost (in the sea, air, or in the magma). And with upward sloping areas, he remonstrated, then slip along the impermeable zone before going out to sea or air. And must the upper trough is well above the zone of oil formation. Otherwise, the side of the mountain, oil could end up in the magma flow. And of course, this very special configuration of hollow exactly the right place may be quite rare. So there will be plenty of places where it can not be any oil in the mountains (and therefore no oil at all, since we saw as other places, it can not exist).
only viable solution. Oil rises in rock on Earth, which is permeable to the top, but not anymore after a few hundred meters or a few kilometers. The problem is that the width of the field is then only 1 or 2 km max. could have an area within a large hollow in the mountains. And so, oil would end up first at the periphery of large hollow, then remonstrated to the top of the mountain to the summit of the great hollow. But it seems hardly possible, because the top of the trough would have every chance to recover while in the magma flow, which would entail the loss of oil.
The trough is wider. Yes, but suddenly, the magma rises into it. In fact, assuming that the mountain has a slope of 45 °, it would mean that every mile is one kilometer in height would entail is long. So, like a mountain of average height is only 6 or 7 miles high, it would mean that the oil storage area would have only a maximum width of 4 or 5 kilometers. Indeed, it is conceivable that in the end zone 6 or 7 km depth, the magma is present and then burning the oil. So if there were large hollow, it would only 4 or 5 km.
So even if oil had the opportunity to stay in the ground plate, the field would have only a tiny width.
In addition, we may say that if oil can go, maybe that magma could also happen. So there is still a good chance that there is an infiltration of magma into the great hollow in question.
course, this kind of thing could not happen on the other side, the side sea or air, since there would be no room for the great hollow. The summit of the great hollow should be outdoors. And so, in fact, it would have only ascending slope.
If the depth was wider on the other side, of course, the summit would fall in vacuum. So we would really just upslope. And oil is apparent in water or air Free. And in addition, a priori, there was almost no oil found in the mountains. So it does not seem to defend this kind of theory.
So the only possibility that there is oil in an area of subdution is that it goes back into the rock of the earth plate (hence the rock is permeable to start, but is no more later), and there met a small or a large recessed area. Large hollow area that can not be found until near the ground. And even if these conditions are present, the fields have a width of 4 or 5 km max. And he would be in the mountains.
So anyway, at best it would field a very thin, especially low ability. We would not field giant. But mostly, there should be anything at all.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Ps3 Headphones Bluetooth
The problem of the width and shape of the oil fields developed in a subduction zone
As we have seen, there are only two or three fields of oil or gas from a subduction zone, then there should be many more. But in addition, two or three fields are not unique width and shape they should have.
Indeed, given the conditions of formation of oil fields from a subduction zone should have a width and a particular form.
Such a field should have a width very low. Since oil is formed over a wide area of less than one kilometer, the resulting field should have a width that should not be so much more than that (1 km). Maybe it could do 2 or 3 kilometers, taking into account the dispersion of the liquid during ascent. But not so much. While in terms of length, it can be very long, since the phenomenon of accumulation should occur along the coast (but, as we have seen, there are almost no oil on subduction zones). And therefore the field should have a width very small compared to its length.
So the width should not exceed 2 or 3 km. And the field should have a very elongated shape.
So one wonders how it is that the fields from a subduction zone that we present are hundreds of kilometers wide and have a distribution whose form is more of a round or that the square of the thin strip.
Then, of course, you could reply that the oil slick would spread by capillary action in the area where it accumulates, thus extending further than where it was during ascent.
But already, it would mean that the field could scatter to disappear. So it is not so much. And then, over tens of millions of years of dispersion, the field would extend over thousands of kilometers.
Then, the extension should be done by capillary faster than the advance plate . It is not impossible. But as we can possibly understand that this is the case when oil rises (although it is not sure why it should go up because oil is caught in the rock). But once back, a priori, the capillary action should be much slower than the advance of the plate. And so, since is trapped in the plate tectonics, the oil should stay on the point of subduction. And should therefore be left with a field that would have the form described at the outset, namely a very elongated shape with a width of only 2 or 3 miles.
And even if oil reached to extend the maritime side of the plate, he could not extend the land side. This is because of this side, it makes sense to have the magma. So the oil would be burned by the magma. Suddenly, the field should only extend the maritime side. And so it should be a form of semicircle . But we not observed fields of such a form. So even this argument for the extension capillary does not.
In fact, it should not even be in the form of a semicircle. Because he does not forget that the plate moves towards the plate maritime land. So, given that oil would extend from the point of subduction, oil from the sides should have a velocity towards the sea less than oil is exactly the reverse movement of plate tectonics. It's like trying to swim upstream in a river. If it goes in exactly the reverse of the current, we will swim upstream faster (and therefore later in time given) that if we go back at an angle. There the oil going in exactly the opposite direction of movement of plate tectonics will go further than oil from an angle. So we should end up with a field that is the form of a 3 leaf clover , if oil goes through that still manages to move faster toward the sea as the plate tectonics moving forward towards the ground ; or with a field having a starting point towards the sea, a field in a T what, if oil from the sides is pushed toward the subduction zone. But obviously, none of the very few fields in this subduction zone has this form.
In short, another argument against the theory biotic.
Indeed, given the conditions of formation of oil fields from a subduction zone should have a width and a particular form.
Such a field should have a width very low. Since oil is formed over a wide area of less than one kilometer, the resulting field should have a width that should not be so much more than that (1 km). Maybe it could do 2 or 3 kilometers, taking into account the dispersion of the liquid during ascent. But not so much. While in terms of length, it can be very long, since the phenomenon of accumulation should occur along the coast (but, as we have seen, there are almost no oil on subduction zones). And therefore the field should have a width very small compared to its length.
So the width should not exceed 2 or 3 km. And the field should have a very elongated shape.
So one wonders how it is that the fields from a subduction zone that we present are hundreds of kilometers wide and have a distribution whose form is more of a round or that the square of the thin strip.
Then, of course, you could reply that the oil slick would spread by capillary action in the area where it accumulates, thus extending further than where it was during ascent.
But already, it would mean that the field could scatter to disappear. So it is not so much. And then, over tens of millions of years of dispersion, the field would extend over thousands of kilometers.
Then, the extension should be done by capillary faster than the advance plate . It is not impossible. But as we can possibly understand that this is the case when oil rises (although it is not sure why it should go up because oil is caught in the rock). But once back, a priori, the capillary action should be much slower than the advance of the plate. And so, since is trapped in the plate tectonics, the oil should stay on the point of subduction. And should therefore be left with a field that would have the form described at the outset, namely a very elongated shape with a width of only 2 or 3 miles.
And even if oil reached to extend the maritime side of the plate, he could not extend the land side. This is because of this side, it makes sense to have the magma. So the oil would be burned by the magma. Suddenly, the field should only extend the maritime side. And so it should be a form of semicircle . But we not observed fields of such a form. So even this argument for the extension capillary does not.
In fact, it should not even be in the form of a semicircle. Because he does not forget that the plate moves towards the plate maritime land. So, given that oil would extend from the point of subduction, oil from the sides should have a velocity towards the sea less than oil is exactly the reverse movement of plate tectonics. It's like trying to swim upstream in a river. If it goes in exactly the reverse of the current, we will swim upstream faster (and therefore later in time given) that if we go back at an angle. There the oil going in exactly the opposite direction of movement of plate tectonics will go further than oil from an angle. So we should end up with a field that is the form of a 3 leaf clover , if oil goes through that still manages to move faster toward the sea as the plate tectonics moving forward towards the ground ; or with a field having a starting point towards the sea, a field in a T what, if oil from the sides is pushed toward the subduction zone. But obviously, none of the very few fields in this subduction zone has this form.
In short, another argument against the theory biotic.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Best Pokemon Team In Pokemon Crystal
Cuckoo then here I woke up this morning to 5 hours, covered with sweat so it's hot and humid. I took a shower and I'm out to see what it looked like the Longueuil early morning ^ ^
Ben is super quiet, and there are squirrels everywhere
^ ^ Anyway here are some photos ^ ^
And tite video ^ ^
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Things Similar To Jibjab
time of formation of oil and lowering speed of tectonic plates
We are told that the formation of oil once the plate subduction Marine is committed takes millions of years, see tens of millions of years . And we also said that oil is formed between 2 km and 3 km below the surface , so over 1 km in all (of course, one wonders how there can have oil at more than 6 km below the surface. But good).
Only problem is that the tectonic plates of advancing 1 and 10 cm per year . So that means that the depression of the plate it is also from 1 to 10 cm per year (as it plunges to 45 degrees: 1 km 1 km advanced causes of depression). So, to 1 km in advance of 10 cm per year, it only takes 10,000 years. Advancing 1 cm, it is 100,000 years. In short, since the formation of petroleum is realized only in the area of 2-3 km, it should be between 10,000 and 100,000 years for plant debris turned into oil.
But in fact, the time of oil formation is necessarily set to the maximum speed for driving the plates. If there is a possibility that oil is formed when the plate is at maximum speed (10 cm per year) then it means that oil is formed all the time at least at this speed there (maybe faster but not slower). So, since there are tectonic plates that move forward by 10 cm per year, that means that oil is formed in a maximum of 10,000 years . Perhaps it is formed more quickly (eg 2000 years), but it can not form more slowly. And it's probably even less than that, since there are hundreds of millions of years, some plates were moving faster than now. Maybe some advanced 15 or 20 cm. So we could then rely on a training time of maximum oil 7000 see 5000 years.
So we are very far from millions or tens of millions of years theory. A
Piore, it does not change anything for the rest of the problem. We can say that was wrong and change the theory for a version with a time of formation of oil in 10,000 years. But it still shows the theory of anything. Since proponents of the official theory are not even fucking make a calculation as simple.
But if we stay with the official theory of oil formation time, then, with speeds of descent of tectonic plates also Quick, oil has not had time to form. Especially since it seems people say that the Carboniferous, the plates were slightly faster than now.
must also change the calculations for the ascent of oil. Let's go back more than 1 km in 10,000 or 20,000 years. Otherwise it would sink with the plate. But until then, we should certainly say that the ascent took millions or tens of millions of years.
So we could say that the entire process that takes tens of millions of years. Time as algae and plankton fall to the seabed in sufficient quantity and are transported by plate tectonic subduction point, then they turn into oil. And so one could say that the tens of millions of years are for the transport phase of plant debris to the point of subduction . But even if we can read the official theory is often quite vague and evasive on the time taken for various stages of the process, it seems that millions of years also affect the timing or processing of oil is (ie, in the band 2-3 km into the earth). Here are excerpts from sites about the formation of petroleum:
Here is what Alain Préat geologist apparently at the Faculty of Sciences (see here ):
This transformation takes place in what the oil called the 'oil window', which produces the 'cooking' of kerogen situated for a normal geothermal gradient (1 ° to 33 m burial) from about 1000 m (at 60 ° C) and 4000 m (110-120 ° C). There will thus form, for several tens of millions of years , oil and gas from source rocks (usually clay) having preserved organic material in sufficient quantity.
The second excerpt is from Memo, a site on the story (see here ):
Another factor that will determine the appearance of oil: time. The temperature rise must take place during a period long enough to "cook" the starting ingredients. Thus, deposits containing organic matter and exposed to low temperatures, but over a long period of time, can produce oil in a manner as effective as more recent deposits subjected to higher temperatures. The time is then said geological and corresponds to periods reaching tens of millions of years .
So, apparently, the official theory speaks well of millions of years and even tens of millions of years for the period of transformation of kerogen into petroleum.
Why was out the theory of oil formation to 2 km deep? Because the more deeply, as it is supposed to be on a subduction zone, and subduction causes the creation of volcanic mountains generally, it would have been fair in magmatic zone (or at least, going back, it would been in). Hence the problem. So it had to be in the areas of 2 or 3 km. Not least deep because we had already found oil at 1 km (and also for the conditions of oil formation, it would not seriously), but not more profound because of the magma. So, the geological conditions of oil formation assumed just left a small window for the formation of petroleum.
Obviously, as already mentioned, there is a small problem: it has found oil at depths much greater than 2 or 3 km.
Only problem is that the tectonic plates of advancing 1 and 10 cm per year . So that means that the depression of the plate it is also from 1 to 10 cm per year (as it plunges to 45 degrees: 1 km 1 km advanced causes of depression). So, to 1 km in advance of 10 cm per year, it only takes 10,000 years. Advancing 1 cm, it is 100,000 years. In short, since the formation of petroleum is realized only in the area of 2-3 km, it should be between 10,000 and 100,000 years for plant debris turned into oil.
But in fact, the time of oil formation is necessarily set to the maximum speed for driving the plates. If there is a possibility that oil is formed when the plate is at maximum speed (10 cm per year) then it means that oil is formed all the time at least at this speed there (maybe faster but not slower). So, since there are tectonic plates that move forward by 10 cm per year, that means that oil is formed in a maximum of 10,000 years . Perhaps it is formed more quickly (eg 2000 years), but it can not form more slowly. And it's probably even less than that, since there are hundreds of millions of years, some plates were moving faster than now. Maybe some advanced 15 or 20 cm. So we could then rely on a training time of maximum oil 7000 see 5000 years.
So we are very far from millions or tens of millions of years theory. A
Piore, it does not change anything for the rest of the problem. We can say that was wrong and change the theory for a version with a time of formation of oil in 10,000 years. But it still shows the theory of anything. Since proponents of the official theory are not even fucking make a calculation as simple.
But if we stay with the official theory of oil formation time, then, with speeds of descent of tectonic plates also Quick, oil has not had time to form. Especially since it seems people say that the Carboniferous, the plates were slightly faster than now.
must also change the calculations for the ascent of oil. Let's go back more than 1 km in 10,000 or 20,000 years. Otherwise it would sink with the plate. But until then, we should certainly say that the ascent took millions or tens of millions of years.
So we could say that the entire process that takes tens of millions of years. Time as algae and plankton fall to the seabed in sufficient quantity and are transported by plate tectonic subduction point, then they turn into oil. And so one could say that the tens of millions of years are for the transport phase of plant debris to the point of subduction . But even if we can read the official theory is often quite vague and evasive on the time taken for various stages of the process, it seems that millions of years also affect the timing or processing of oil is (ie, in the band 2-3 km into the earth). Here are excerpts from sites about the formation of petroleum:
Here is what Alain Préat geologist apparently at the Faculty of Sciences (see here ):
This transformation takes place in what the oil called the 'oil window', which produces the 'cooking' of kerogen situated for a normal geothermal gradient (1 ° to 33 m burial) from about 1000 m (at 60 ° C) and 4000 m (110-120 ° C). There will thus form, for several tens of millions of years , oil and gas from source rocks (usually clay) having preserved organic material in sufficient quantity.
The second excerpt is from Memo, a site on the story (see here ):
Another factor that will determine the appearance of oil: time. The temperature rise must take place during a period long enough to "cook" the starting ingredients. Thus, deposits containing organic matter and exposed to low temperatures, but over a long period of time, can produce oil in a manner as effective as more recent deposits subjected to higher temperatures. The time is then said geological and corresponds to periods reaching tens of millions of years .
So, apparently, the official theory speaks well of millions of years and even tens of millions of years for the period of transformation of kerogen into petroleum.
Why was out the theory of oil formation to 2 km deep? Because the more deeply, as it is supposed to be on a subduction zone, and subduction causes the creation of volcanic mountains generally, it would have been fair in magmatic zone (or at least, going back, it would been in). Hence the problem. So it had to be in the areas of 2 or 3 km. Not least deep because we had already found oil at 1 km (and also for the conditions of oil formation, it would not seriously), but not more profound because of the magma. So, the geological conditions of oil formation assumed just left a small window for the formation of petroleum.
Obviously, as already mentioned, there is a small problem: it has found oil at depths much greater than 2 or 3 km.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Veet Why Not On Genital
^ ^ Vive been
That here in Montreal is like this every day for at least two weeks (more or less eh today is a particularly violent because of the wind ^ ^) since I came back to me in May, I only had two days of good weather ...
So sorry for not having posted news before that, it's just that the shots I had nothing interesting to say ^ ^
That here in Montreal is like this every day for at least two weeks (more or less eh today is a particularly violent because of the wind ^ ^) since I came back to me in May, I only had two days of good weather ...
So sorry for not having posted news before that, it's just that the shots I had nothing interesting to say ^ ^
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)