We are told that oil was formed mainly   Silurian (-443, -416 000 000 years ago), Jurassic   (-200, -145) And   Cretaceous (-145, -65), and since then there has been more that has formed. 
 
People are allowed to say that oil has continued to form after these times there and it continues to form a little bit every day. But the official theory remains one: no oil formed after 65 million years ago.
 
Why this theory? Well simply because if we said that the oil formed a continuous and there are still formed gradually today, there would be plenty of oil in training is to say the proto-oil (and several types of proto-petroleum, according to the progress of the transformation). However, the proto-petroleum, there is no . So to explain that he had a theory that oil production stopped long ago. So no need to explain the total absence of proto-petroleum.
 
Obviously, we do not quite understand why oil prices have not continued to be produced over millions of years. The conditions that led to its production had not changed much. This is also why many people believe that oil has continued to occur after these periods there. Yup, it makes sense. But in this case, there would be proto-petroleum, and there is none.
 
So either it was a theory rather illogical, but not contradicted by the absence of proto-petroleum, or we have a logical theory, but contradicted by the absence of proto-petroleum. The designers of the official theory of oil formation is preferred to have a weird theory but not contradicted by the facts.
 
Obviously, with the theory of abiotic oil, no problem. Because everything goes deep, it's normal that we do not find a proto-oil.
 
  
People are allowed to say that oil has continued to form after these times there and it continues to form a little bit every day. But the official theory remains one: no oil formed after 65 million years ago.
Why this theory? Well simply because if we said that the oil formed a continuous and there are still formed gradually today, there would be plenty of oil in training is to say the proto-oil (and several types of proto-petroleum, according to the progress of the transformation). However, the proto-petroleum, there is no . So to explain that he had a theory that oil production stopped long ago. So no need to explain the total absence of proto-petroleum.
Obviously, we do not quite understand why oil prices have not continued to be produced over millions of years. The conditions that led to its production had not changed much. This is also why many people believe that oil has continued to occur after these periods there. Yup, it makes sense. But in this case, there would be proto-petroleum, and there is none.
So either it was a theory rather illogical, but not contradicted by the absence of proto-petroleum, or we have a logical theory, but contradicted by the absence of proto-petroleum. The designers of the official theory of oil formation is preferred to have a weird theory but not contradicted by the facts.
Obviously, with the theory of abiotic oil, no problem. Because everything goes deep, it's normal that we do not find a proto-oil.