According to the official theory of oil, there would be biological debris that would fall into the oil. And, according to the official theory, it proves that oil is of biological origin. That would be the remains of bacteria that were there originally.
But it is by no means an argument refuting the theory of abiotic oil. To make this refutation, there should be no other explanation possible when the presence of these traces. Now we can explain that to at least two other ways.
1) It is possible that these are only biological contamination once the oil came to the surface. Or via the tube wells, which are certainly not kept in sterile conditions.
2) It has been shown that there are bacteria living in the stone to great depths. So it could be simply a contamination during the ascent of oil to the pocket where it will stand. This contamination during ascent is a more than likely. And even once in the reserve, oil is likely to be contaminated. So now, we are sure these bacteria will be found in the oil during extraction.
So this argument that supporters of oil would biotic final, is no absolutely not.
But it is by no means an argument refuting the theory of abiotic oil. To make this refutation, there should be no other explanation possible when the presence of these traces. Now we can explain that to at least two other ways.
1) It is possible that these are only biological contamination once the oil came to the surface. Or via the tube wells, which are certainly not kept in sterile conditions.
2) It has been shown that there are bacteria living in the stone to great depths. So it could be simply a contamination during the ascent of oil to the pocket where it will stand. This contamination during ascent is a more than likely. And even once in the reserve, oil is likely to be contaminated. So now, we are sure these bacteria will be found in the oil during extraction.
So this argument that supporters of oil would biotic final, is no absolutely not.
0 comments:
Post a Comment