According to the official theory, oil Marine forms when the algae residue accumulated at the bottom of the sea burrow underground. This is because the tectonic plate slides beneath a continental plate (subduction). The conditions for the formation of oil are at hand.
Well, as already seen, of course, the official theory is not hampered by the fact that the middle of the ocean is empty of life. But hey, never mind.
What is important is that since this is supposed to be general, we should have oil at all locations where there is a subduction zone . Here is a map of subduction zones.
click image to enlarge The subduction zones are where the arrows are going towards each other.
So there should be any giant fields on the west coast of South America .
Japan should also have giant fields on the East Coast.
And finally, India, it depends. If the area was already supposed to be terrestrial Carboniferous, it should not be any oil. Otherwise, there should be here too giant fields in northern India. Here is a second
map.
This second card is not very clear (it is not known if these are only a subduction zone or if more areas of friction between the plates). But if the areas with the triangles are subduction zones, it would then add any subduction zone that will Java in Bangladesh through the island of Sumatra and the west coast of Burma and the area back of the right of Indonesia and the east coast of the Philippines to Japan (and continues to a tiny piece of the west coast of Russia). All these areas should have fields offshore giants. It would add
also the northern Middle East . Here we have the same problem for India. Is it considered to have been a sea area to the carboniferous? But, having said that, to justify the presence of oil in Iraq, Iran, etc. ... I think it said it was a maritime area. So it is possible that under the official theory, there should be some giant oil fields in the northern area of the Middle East.
now check what it is. Well, when you look at the maps of these areas where oil is, we see that there is virtually no field giant overdraft.
South America, the only deposits offshore the west coast are in Ecuador. Elsewhere, there is nothing. In Central America, there is nothing on the West Coast.
From Japan side, there is a tiny production of gas in the Tokyo area and Niigata. And oil production is marginal (a few KBBL / d).
And the side of the line Java / Sumatra / West Coast of Burma / Bangladesh was the only off-shore oil in Bangladesh. There is oil offshore Indonesia (Java / Sumatra), but the wrong side. There are about Odds are. But it's more than 400 km from the beginning of the subduction zone.
On the side of the line that begins right Indonesia, then rising to the east coast of the Philippines to Japan , there is nothing.
For both areas (north India and the Middle East) that lend themselves to questioning that was of the Carboniferous sea areas, there is no oil at these locations.
Northern India contains no oil (there is the area of Barmer, but it seems to be above the subduction zone. And it's not a giant field, far away).
And Northern Middle East same. There are fields before the subduction zone, some after, but apparently not at the location of the subduction zone.
course, given that there is oil everywhere, probably you would find if you looked in those areas. But anyway, for now, what we see is that:
1) If there is no oil, and oil companies have explored these areas, the official theory is then contradicted by the facts
2) If the oil companies have not sought on that side, there is oil or not, it means that oil companies do not even believe their own theories, since for the offshore oil, they would seek the oil in these priority areas there.
So, the theory of the formation of offshore oil in subduction zones slightly beats of the wing. If the oil companies either do not believe in their theory, have either tried and found nothing, the credibility of it is zero.
Moreover, a funny thing is that almost everywhere there is still a subduction zone maritime it's actually on the side opposite the mainland or the island we found nearly all offshore oil. This is the case for South America, where it is on the East Coast there are plenty of offshore oil. This applies to the area along Java and Sumatra, where oil is found on the east coast of these islands. And they are also found on the East Coast of India, which is opposite the subduction zone (this saying is true there are on the coasts of Bangladesh, but still). This is the case for the area dating back to Japan. where oil offshore the Philippines is well west of the subduction zone. I think it is also the case for Japan. There is oil off-shore to the west of Japan (China Sea), but not east.
And even for subduction zones that are no longer shipping (North Indian and Northern Middle East) oil is found beside, before, after, the area in question, but almost never above . Ie at the place that should be the maximum production of oil from marine origin according the official theory).
0 comments:
Post a Comment