By learning about the official theory about the transformation of plant oil and coal, it becomes clear that implies the presence of huge quantities of carbon in the Carboniferous era. Indeed, to obtain quantities of fossil carbon that already important is the form of coal, oil, gas, etc ..., the official theory says it should constitute a much more important fossil carbon in the form of kerogen.
1) The massive amounts of carbon present on earth in the carboniferous implied amount of kerogen present in soil
For the amount of kerogen present in the soil, the official oil theorists have already made a estimate. There would 10 million billion tonnes of kerogen in the crust (10 power 16). As kerogen is mostly carbon, we can say that it is almost the same in terms of quantity of carbon.
In the official model in question, the biomass was pumped into the air a quantity of carbon equivalent to the amount of kerogen formed: about 10 million billion tons of carbon. So, we are told that there were ten million billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere and soil were found in the crust via the burial of plants. Let
thus the amount of carbon currently present on earth, both in soil than in air.
39,000 Gt of carbon in the oceans
2000 Gt of carbon in the biosphere (plants and animals: including 600 Gt of living organisms and a priori 1400 GT consist of detritus)
750 Gt of carbon into the atmosphere
Total: about 42,000 Gt (gigatons)
Over 30 million Gt of carbon in the lithosphere (ie the earth's crust, it is mainly limestone)
And 10 million Gt of fossil carbon (kerogen, coal, oil, gas, etc ...)
So we are currently about 42,000 Gt of carbon by land, sea and air (excluding carbon fossil). Is already 238 times less than the carbon of the kerogen.
But in fact, remove the carbon from the oceans of the problem. Indeed, the carbon in the oceans and land, carbon is ultimately pumped into the atmosphere. These amounts are added to the mass of carbon lost by the atmosphere. This is in addition to the 10 million Gt of fossil carbon present in the earth. So ultimately, we have 10 million Gt of fossil carbon + 30 million Gt of carbon in rock + 39 000 Gt of carbon in the wonders pumped into the atmosphere. Consider that 39,000 Gt oceans are negligible compared to the carbon stored in the lithosphere. was therefore 40 million Gt of carbon from the atmosphere and stored in the crust.
Also, where does the carbon in biomass? CO2 from the air, primarily. So the source of renewal is in fact mainly CO2 in the air.
So, the source of carbon in biomass which could be pumped to form kerogen is only the atmosphere. So, more than 750 Gt
course, lithosphere rebroadcast via volcanoes, 0.1 Gt per year of carbon (carbon, according to the official theory is the one who ended up buried in the lithosphere. So , this is not an inflow). But as the balance is negative to the lithosphere (0.3 against 0.1 Gt Gt injected reissued), anyway, it's the atmosphere that provides carbon to the lithosphere and not the reverse.
This means that the kerogen contained about 13,300 times more carbon than the amount of carbon present on Earth that can serve as a source for biomass. If we add carbon to the lithosphere in the form of carbonate rock (30 Gt), that means there are 53,300 times more carbon in the lithosphere in the atmosphere.
So it causes a big, huge problem. It means Carboniferous say that there was in the atmosphere 53,300 times more carbon than now.
This is completely absurd. In fact, it seems that the official model, biomass, or invents the atmosphere of carbon. There would be creation ex nihilo of carbon. There would be 300 Mt of carbon that disappear each year in the land (according to the source Wikipedia). What should have resulted in hundreds of millions of years to tens of millions of Gt of carbon buried. And those 300 come from outer space Mt. biomass or the atmosphere would have a magic power to create carbon. And theorists would never occupied with the problem of the origin of carbon. Of course, under these conditions of total lack of reflection on this subject, the question of where do the massive amounts of carbon that was originally in the atmosphere does not arise (indeed, given that it seems that carbon goes only in one direction, from the atmosphere to the lithosphere, one wonders how anyone could have initially an equal quantity of carbon into the atmosphere).
2) The incredibly lucky to still have carbon in the atmosphere despite the loss it has been over the ages
So in fact, there would be a loss huge carbon from the atmosphere. This would tend to disappear into the earth. But, coincidentally, there is a time when we are lucky to still have enough carbon to there being life on earth.
calculate the amount of kerogen formed each year to obtain the total amount of kerogen present. There were 10 million billion tons of kerogen formed over 360 million years (early Carboniferous). It's been 10 billion tons lost every 360 years. Either 1 billion every 36 years. So about 28 million tons every year.
On the side of the atmosphere, there are 750 billion tons of carbon. So with the pumping of carbon from the atmosphere by plants required to obtain the amount of kerogen present, all 36 years, it loses 1 billion tons of carbon and therefore, after years 750x36 is to say, after 27,000 years, there will be more CO2 in the atmosphere .
short, we have a chance absolutely incredible. At about 27,000 years near, there was more carbon in the atmosphere and life on earth disappeared. It would have been enough that at times the pace was faster, so we're not here to talk about. Wow, what incredible opportunity. Because that 27,000 years, across the earth, there is nothing at all.
And in any case, the rhythm disappears when the carbon in 27,000 years, unless you reject a good amount in the atmosphere, there will be more carbon.
And in fact, maybe even less than that. Given that ultimately, there are 300 million tons of carbon sink into the ground as the official model (300 to form carbonate rocks, 100 to form the kerogen, which are less than 100 re-emitted by volcanoes from carbonate rocks ) was in reality 10 times less time than that before the carbon has completely disappeared the atmosphere. So in reality, it would only 2,700 years of carbon into the atmosphere before us.
All this is absolutely ridiculous.
3) The amount of carbon that implies it is compatible with life?
Conversely, it means that every 27,000 years preceding our era, the amount of CO2 increases the amount present . There are 0.036% of carbon into the atmosphere. So there are 270 million years ago, there were 10,000 times more. Or 360%. There were 3.6 times more carbon than all other elements contained in air (nitrogen and oxygen). And there are 360 million years ago, it was 479%, almost 5 times more. So, a priori, there was no one living thing on earth. Unless of course, that living beings can live with such a large proportion of carbon. A priori this is not the case. So one wonders how early dinosaurs may have occurred.
If one adds the amount of carbon in carbonate rocks, we multiply this figure by 4% or 1916 there are 360 million years.
And if we take the official figures of the annual transfer of carbon to the soil (10 times higher than the figure required to arrive at the amount of kerogen present) we arrive at the figure of 4790%.
Above that problem, we have official figures on the rate of CO2 into the atmosphere. There are 4.25 billion years, there have been 30% of CO2 in the atmosphere. And we would have had only 3% there a billion years. So the figures we can deduce the amount of kerogen (and carbonate rocks) does not fit at all with the official figures.
4) Why do not we see the amount of carbon decline over millions of years?
should also be noted that since the plant carbon into the earth, it would of attending a gradual decline in the rate of CO2 in the atmosphere on all of the 360 million years ago . And with a very precise amount of about 0.144% of the current atmosphere every 27,000 years (the amount of carbon lost in the lithosphere during this period; kerogen + carbonate rocks). See about 0.36%, using the figure of 300 million net tonnes of carbon lost annually in the lithosphere. But precisely this is not the case. CO2 levels remained relatively stable (with the addition of lifts at times) over time.
5) More than CO2, but climate colder
the way, if carbon was present as CO2, as we are told that CO2 is responsible for global warming, it would be a tremendous heat there are 360 million years. However, precisely the Carboniferous period is supposed to be a rather cold, with a portion of the continents under the ice (Africa and South America). He should know.
is probably the reason why the official theory says there were only 3% of CO2 in the atmosphere there is a billion years. Otherwise, yes, with a much higher rate, it would be a problem regarding the temperature of the climate, the official model, there are 360 million years.
0 comments:
Post a Comment