What is the lie about global warming? In reality, to accept the high price of oil in particular, and hydrocarbons in general. And in fact it is even better. It is even to be desired by people who believe in this theory.
According to the model in question, the excess CO2 in the atmosphere which cause global warming. And the latter is presented as a phenomenon with catastrophic consequences. However, consumption of oil is the main cause of the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere. So, someone who cares about global warming will desire a lower consumption of these hydrocarbons. And what better way (apart from an authoritarian decision) to get that down a price increase?
So, this person will be happy that oil prices rise, since it will mean a drop in consumption and therefore lower CO2 production. This person will accept more readily the high oil prices. Either low case (if the person is moderately involved), it will find it hard, but she said that at least it will fight against global climate. Either high case (if the person is highly involved), the person will applaud the arrival of oil price increases. She ardently wish.
is even better than the theory of peak oil. It can present high prices of oil as a fatality. So it allows to accept the increase by the people. The theory of global warming, it allows outright desire to rising oil prices by the people. It is more passive and it eventually becomes active side of the oil industry. It is even harder. But hey, it's not so much to do even better but rather to have two theories that work together to accept the high price of oil.
course, in reality, those hopes are dashed. Rising oil prices will not lead to a decrease in consumption (the rise is of course carefully controlled and limited to such a thing does not happen). It will only result in huge profits for the oil industry.
course, it can lead to other developments, if we go further into hysteria on global warming. It can afford to accept draconian laws by citizens on behalf of the fight against global warming. So the hysteria to a potential which is not confined to the mere adherence of people to higher oil prices. Anyway, in fact, it already fits the kind of current climate of fear (fear of terrorism, fear of new diseases, fear of man-made disasters, etc ...) which is one of the elements allow to pass draconian laws to put safety first.
For more information on lies about global warming, see the blog http://www.climat-sceptique.com/
According to the model in question, the excess CO2 in the atmosphere which cause global warming. And the latter is presented as a phenomenon with catastrophic consequences. However, consumption of oil is the main cause of the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere. So, someone who cares about global warming will desire a lower consumption of these hydrocarbons. And what better way (apart from an authoritarian decision) to get that down a price increase?
So, this person will be happy that oil prices rise, since it will mean a drop in consumption and therefore lower CO2 production. This person will accept more readily the high oil prices. Either low case (if the person is moderately involved), it will find it hard, but she said that at least it will fight against global climate. Either high case (if the person is highly involved), the person will applaud the arrival of oil price increases. She ardently wish.
is even better than the theory of peak oil. It can present high prices of oil as a fatality. So it allows to accept the increase by the people. The theory of global warming, it allows outright desire to rising oil prices by the people. It is more passive and it eventually becomes active side of the oil industry. It is even harder. But hey, it's not so much to do even better but rather to have two theories that work together to accept the high price of oil.
course, in reality, those hopes are dashed. Rising oil prices will not lead to a decrease in consumption (the rise is of course carefully controlled and limited to such a thing does not happen). It will only result in huge profits for the oil industry.
course, it can lead to other developments, if we go further into hysteria on global warming. It can afford to accept draconian laws by citizens on behalf of the fight against global warming. So the hysteria to a potential which is not confined to the mere adherence of people to higher oil prices. Anyway, in fact, it already fits the kind of current climate of fear (fear of terrorism, fear of new diseases, fear of man-made disasters, etc ...) which is one of the elements allow to pass draconian laws to put safety first.
For more information on lies about global warming, see the blog http://www.climat-sceptique.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment